Tuesday, September 28

First US Navy carrier strike group to deploy with F-35C stealth fighters sails into the South China Sea


  • The Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group sailed into the South China Sea this week carrying stealth fighters.
  • The Carl Vinson is the first US Navy aircraft carrier to deploy with F-35Cs.
  • Chinese state-affiliated media criticized the carrier’s arrival, calling it a “provocative deployment.”

A deployed US Navy aircraft carrier sailed into the South China Sea this week carrying F-35 stealth fighters in a first for the service.

The Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group departed San Diego early last month, making history at it sailed into the Pacific.

At that time, the Nimitz-class carrier USS Carl Vinson became the first US Navy aircraft carrier to deploy with an integrated air wing consisting of both fourth-generation F/A-18 Super Hornets and fifth-generation F-35C Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters.

The strike group is now in the South China Sea and conducting maritime security operations, the US Navy said in a press statement Tuesday.

The Navy released a photo Tuesday of an F-35 assigned to the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 launching from the Carl Vinson.

An F-35C Lightning II, assigned to the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147, launches from the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) while the carrier transits the South China Sea with Independence -variant littoral combat ship USS Tulsa (LCS 16), Sept. 7, 2021

An F-35C Lightning II, assigned to the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147, launches from the flight deck of Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) while the carrier transits the South China Sea with Independence -variant littoral combat ship USS Tulsa (LCS 16), Sept. 7, 2021.

US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Haydn N. Smith


The F-35A is a variant built for the Air Force. The F-35B, mainly used by the Marine Corps, is designed to fight from amphibious assault ships. And the C variant is designed to operate aboard US Navy carriers. It can carry more fuel and weaponry and is built for catapult launches and fly-in arrestments.

Chinese state-affiliated media outlet Global Times reacted negatively to the Carl Vinson’s arrival in the South China Sea, calling it a “provocative deployment” and reporting that the Chinese military is on alert.

Chinese military statements on US Navy activities, however, have been primarily focused on the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold, which conducted a freedom-of-navigation operation near Mischief Reef in the Spratly Islands, contested territory claimed by China.

Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force Senior Col. Tian Junli, spokesperson for the PLA Southern Theater Command, accused the US Navy of trespassing and violating Chinese sovereignty. Tian said that Chinese naval and air forces warned the US warship off.

“The United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows, as USS Benfold did here,” US 7th Fleet said in a statement. “Nothing [the People’s Republic of China] says otherwise will deter us.”

While Chinese military statements have of late been focused primarily on the Benfold, China regularly bristles at the presence of US carrier strike groups in the South China Sea.

When the US Navy conducted dual aircraft carrier operations in the South China Sea last summer, for instance, the Chinese foreign ministry accused the US of deliberately flexing its muscles in a show of force that it said undermined peace and stability in the region.

The US has repeatedly criticized China for its assertive, coercive, and destabilizing behavior in the South China Sea.

“We need to find ways to pressure and raise the pressure, frankly, on Beijing to abide by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and to challenge its bullying and excessive maritime claims,” ​​Vice President Kamala Harris said in Vietnam last month.

Seventh Fleet said Wednesday that China’s “behavior stands in contrast to the United States’ adherence to international law and our vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific region.”



www.businessinsider.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *