Sunday, October 17

Fitbit Charge 5 vs. Fitbit Luxe: which one should you buy? | Digital Trends Spanish

Fitbit is a benchmark in the field of smart bracelets. The manufacturer, now owned by Google, releases different versions of its models every year to which it adds innovative features, which often set precedents in the sector.

This time we had on our analysis table the Fitbit Luxe (the first of its lineage) and the new Fitbit Charge 5. After testing both bracelets in a more exhaustive way, we were able to check which are the most notable characteristics of each one and what they are used for. differentiate, so you can choose which of the two is the one that best suits your needs.

Design and display

The Fitbit Luxe is a bracelet that stands out for being very thin and tiny. If you usually wear larger bracelets or watches, you may feel that it looks tiny on your wrist. However, for those who make the leap from quantifiers like Xiaomi’s Mi Band, the size is perfect.

On the other hand, the design of the Fitbit Luxe is less sporty than usual, since it can be purchased with its stainless steel case bathed in gold, graphite and silver. It is a perfect device for those who want to keep track of their health parameters, but without wearing a product so clearly focused on sports.

In the case of the Charge 5, it is thinner than its predecessor and has a more elegant design thanks to the incorporation of more rounded corners as we saw in the Fitbit Versa 3 (even so it looks much sportier than the Luxe). The Fitbit Charge 5 is also made of stainless steel, but it is lighter than the Luxe (it weighs only 28 grams).

Both devices feature a color AMOLED touchscreen, but the Fitbit Luxe is longer and narrower (0.76 inches) than the Fitibit Charge 5 (0.86 inches). In addition, the Charge 5 has two sensors on the sides of the panel, an EDA and an electrocardiogram.

Performance and features

The Fitbit Charge 5 has several features that the Luxe model lacks. For example, in terms of health, it has the possibility of measuring our electrodermal activity (EDA) to know our stress levels or of performing electrocardiograms (ECG), so it is much more complete in this regard. In addition to this, the Charge 5 includes an NFC sensor that allows us to make payments, a GPS that allows it to be independent of the phone to track steps and activity, as well as an altimeter to measure the elevation of a point above sea level. .

In both we have 20 exercise modes with automatic recognition support for basic activities such as running, walking and swimming. Both measure training intensity and track daily activity, as well as variations in heart rate, sleep tracking, blood oxygen level, and menstrual cycles.

As for the functions of a smartphone or smart bracelet, the Charge 5 has an advantage, because in addition to being able to see notifications and send quick responses as with the Luxe, you can control your music on Spotify and it offers you support for Fitbit Pay.


The Charge 5 also wins this battle, as its battery lasts for up to seven days on a single charge (remember that with always-on display mode and SpO2 monitoring on it will drain faster). As for charging times, you will need two hours to go from 0 to 100 percent with this model.

By comparison, the Fitbit Luxe offers five days of battery life and also takes a couple of hours to go from 0 to 100 percent charged.


The functions of these two activity bracelets are very similar when it comes to health or exercise and sleep monitoring. If you want a slim device that you can wear regardless of how you dress, the Luxe is the best option, but keep in mind that on large wrists it can look too small. In addition, you will have to do without payments through NFC and the integrated GPS.

For its part, the Charge 5 adapts to larger wrists and both the additional functions and its greater autonomy must be taken into account. Regarding prices, the Luxe costs 149.95 euros, while the Charge 5 is at 179.95 euros, so that aspect is not decisive when deciding between one or the other.

Editor’s Recommendations

var stage = decodeURIComponent(0); var options = JSON.parse(decodeURIComponent('')); var allOptions = {};

if (stage > 0 && window.DTOptions) { allOptions = window.DTOptions.getAll();

Object.keys(options).forEach(function(groupK) { if (options[groupK] && typeof options[groupK] === 'object') { Object.keys(options[groupK]).forEach(function(k) { if (!allOptions[groupK] || typeof allOptions[groupK] !== 'object') { allOptions[groupK] = {}; }

allOptions[groupK][k] = options[groupK][k]; }); } }); } else { allOptions = options; }

var getAll = function () { return allOptions; };

var get = function (key, group, def) { key = key || ''; group = group || decodeURIComponent('qnqb92BhrzmkpqGx'); def = (typeof def !== 'undefined') ? def : null;

if (typeof allOptions[group] !== 'undefined') { if (key && typeof allOptions[group][key] !== 'undefined') { return allOptions[group][key]; } }

return def; };

var set = function (key, group, data) { key = key || ''; group = group || decodeURIComponent('qnqb92BhrzmkpqGx'); data = data || null;

if (key) { if (typeof allOptions[group] === 'undefined') { allOptions[group] = {}; }

allOptions[group][key] = data; } };

var del = function (key, group) { key = key || ''; group = group || decodeURIComponent('qnqb92BhrzmkpqGx');

if (typeof allOptions[group] !== 'undefined') { if (key && typeof allOptions[group][key] !== 'undefined') { allOptions[group][key] = null; } } };

window.DTOptions = { get: get, getAll: getAll, set: set, del: del, }; }());

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *