Tuesday, September 26

Is the student who made $110 million off a meme stock a lucky gambler or conviction investor?

Twenty-year-old Jake Freeman bet US$27 million in Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and sold his stake just weeks later

Article content

When news emerged recently of the 20-year-old student who had made US$110 million buying and selling shares in a tired homeware brand, there was an understandable uproar. The Financial Times revealed Jake Freeman had invested US$27 million in Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. in July, selling it only a few weeks later for nearly five times as much.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Social media exploded with snide commentary, most of it focused on how entitled Freeman was to have US$27 million at his disposal in the first place. (Family and friends helped fund the trade, Freeman told the FT.) A few sniped, too, that the return was “not that impressive.” (Really?)

Article content

Among the tide of Twitter criticism, though, no one thought to make the obvious critique: Freeman bet his whole US$27 million on one historically volatile stock. BB&B has gyrated between US$4 and US$28 over the past year, often moving wildly with no other impetus than social media hype.

Article content

In doing so, he junked the old-school investment principle that no matter what your timeframe, a good investor will traditionally choose a broad balance of equities, bonds and other ideally non-correlated assets. In short, a good investor diversifies risk.

Advertisement 3

Article content

Or to quote Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz, who in 1952 coined the “modern portfolio theory” concept, “in choosing a portfolio, investors should seek broad diversification” and be “willing to ride out the bad as well as the good times.”

Markowitz could not have known quite how influential his thinking would prove. Among other things, he helped turbocharge a previously modest mutual-fund industry. By the end of last year, according to data provider Statista, US$27 trillion was invested in mutual funds in the United States alone, with a further US$7 trillion in exchange-traded funds.

Over the past decade, according to mutual fund giant Vanguard Group Inc., you could have earned an annual 13.8 per cent tracking the S&P 500. That is impressive by most measures, but it is a long way from Freeman’s 400 per cent in a month .

Advertisement 4

Article content

Though the scale and speed of the student’s spoils attracted particular attention, he is really just a poster boy for the meme-stock generation of investors, who have spent the past couple of years looking for big quick wins from buying and selling undervalued stocks or hyping and dumping crypto coins, often with borrowed money. (Some have succeeded, others have failed, occasionally with tragic consequences.)

The grounds for criticism are obvious: this is gambling, not investing; crypto is a Ponzi scheme; the scope for financial misery is vast.

Yet among the valid skepticism, there is a kernel of validity in what Freeman has spotlighted. Though he hails from a moneyed background, his is a generation that has felt deprived of the asset appreciation enjoyed by their parents and grandparents. The resentment will have been sharpened by cost-of-living increases unseen for nearly half a century.

Advertisement 5

Article content

For many, the hunt for high-risk, high-return gains may feel like an imperative, all the more so given the generally lacklustre returns in markets as a whole, and a daunting macro outlook, both economically and geopolitically. So far this year , the S&P 500 has lost about 14 per cent.

Some of the world’s wiliest investors might agree — at least up to a point. Equity long-short hedge funds typically have very concentrated portfolios. Warren Buffett (who famously called diversification “protection against ignorance”) now has three-quarters of his equity investments in five companies (Apple Inc., Bank of America Corp., Chevron Corp., Coca-Cola Co. and American Express Co).

Advertisement 6

Article content

In the United Kingdom, Baillie Gifford’s Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust has prospered largely thanks to outsized bets on tech stocks such as Tesla Inc. (though predictably it has suffered this year).

There is academic research to support high-concentration investment. An influential 2006 paper led by Klaas Baks at Goizueta Business School found “a positive relation between mutual fund performance and managers’ willingness to take big bets in a relatively small number of stocks.” Outperformance amounted to as much as four per cent a year, he said.

This is not to dismiss the idea of ​​diversification, said James Anderson, who recently stepped down after a strong record at Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust; rather stockpickers should concentrate on a small number of “conviction” holdings, and an end investor should select a range of stockpickers.

But Anderson stresses that even big conviction investors are a long way from Freeman on the metric that arguably makes the biggest difference between punting and investing: timeframe. A month is too short? “Even a 12-month horizon is very difficult,” he said . “You have to invest preferably for the really long term: at least 10 years, forever.”

The Financial Times Ltd.


If you like this story, sign up for the FP Investor Newsletter.




Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.