Thursday, September 21

“Sectarianism” and “contempt for the Spanish”: the PP confirms its ‘no’ to the energy saving plan demanded by Brussels

The Popular Party has resorted this Thursday to a long string of reproaches and disqualifications against the progressive government to justify its rejection of the validation of the royal decree law on energy saving that has been debated in the Congress of Deputies, in an extraordinary Plenary. Despite the attitude of the main opposition party, the rule will be endorsed in the first parliamentary session of the political year by a large majority of the Lower House thanks to the support of the usual members of the Executive who, however, have reproached the PSOE and United We Can negotiate those backups at the last minute.

Sánchez asks the PP to explain its ‘no’ to an energy saving plan agreed with the EU and that benefits the middle class

Know more

The debate on the initiative has begun with the intervention of the Minister of Mobility and Urban Agenda, Raquel Sánchez, who, after summarizing all the measures included in the decree -among them, the limitations on air conditioning, the shutdown of administrative buildings and shop windows , but also transport aid and an increase in study grants–, has asked the PP, in a last attempt that has been frustrated, to change its position and support validation.

After recalling that the measures are aimed at “confronting Putin’s blackmail” and “combating the threat of climate change”, the minister appealed for political unity to give the green light to savings initiatives agreed upon within the Union European. “Such important issues must reach consensus and not obstructionist attitudes,” she assured, addressing the PP, which she asked to defend the “general interest against partisan interests.” If they don’t, Sánchez added, “those who would be hitting are thousands of citizens who are paying for public transport, passenger and freight transport companies, the self-employed and thousands of young people who need to supplement their scholarships. Think of them when you vote ”, she asked them, without success.

The minister recalled that the measures have already been reflected in energy savings of 9.5% in the last week and 8.5% compared to last year. “Think about the effects that you have already produced”, she told the PP deputies, before emphasizing that the citizens are acting as “responsible and supportive, just the opposite of the right-wing formations”. “There are two types of conservatism, the retrograde and denialist that sits between us and the modern European right that, wherever it governs, is adopting measures similar to ours. This decree law is Europe, it is commitment and it is solidarity, it is common sense”, she added.

The PP charges against the “command and command”

Time and time again, Sánchez has asked the PP to “reconsider”, but the general secretary of the popular party, Cuca Gamarra, not only has not moved from the ‘no’ announced by her party, but has also delved into the accusations against the Government . For her, the royal decree law “is indefensible” and to justify that statement, she has assured that the current one is “the most expensive government in history” with an economic policy that, in her opinion, “is a failure and a burden for the Spanish people”. “We will not support patches that have negative consequences for the Spanish. To do serious things they have the support of the PP, for improvisations and the command and command, no, ”she pointed out, confirming that rejection of the decree.

Gamarra has complained of not having received “not a single call” from the Executive to negotiate the text. That is why he has spoken of Moncloa’s “impositions” and that the measures are an “example of contempt for the Spanish.” The ‘number two’ of the PP has claimed the “planning” of her party “in the face of the intransigence” of the Government, who has been asked to “leave aside ideology and sectarianism and think about what interests the Spaniards” .

In contrast, regular partners of the Executive such as ERC, PNV, EH Bildu and Más País have confirmed their support for the text, although with criticism of the Government. “They have done it again. They mix churras with merinos again”, the ERC deputy Joan Capdevila reproached the members of the Executive, who has assured that he shares “some” of the measures of the decree, “others not” and others “halfway”.

Mertxe Aizpurua, from EH Bildu, assured, for her part, that her five deputies voted “in favor of responsibility with the planet” and for sharing “two of the pillars” of the decree: the promotion of sustainability and public transport. However, during his intervention, Aizpurua has considered that in the face of the measures adopted, which have an expiration date in November 2023, “structural” and “permanent” initiatives should be adopted, promoting, for example, the “transformation” of the energy system. “This responsibility must be above partisan and political calculations until we acquire the climate awareness that we need”, he has riveted, to then demand “a new paradigm that takes into account the limits of the planet”.

The PNV asks the Government for another way of negotiating

For her, the way in which the government has negotiated, at the last minute, hours before the debate in Congress, “is not the best formula to grease the progressive majority.”

“They put us in the dilemma between everything or nothing,” summarized, along the same lines, her criticism of the Government Idoia Sagastizabal, deputy of the PNV, another of the Government’s supporters this Thursday. She has lamented that this strategy “has become habitual” on the part of the Executive, to which she has launched a request: “Do not wait until the last moment because the moment will come when the accounts will not come out.” Íñigo Errejón, from Más País, has also shared the need for energy saving measures to be “structural”.

Vox and Ciudadanos, like the PP, have used their interventions to accuse the Government of acting “by decree” and have reproached it, once again, for their support being from nationalist and pro-independence forces.