Friday, March 29

The PSOE will take to Justice the fire in the Sierra de la Culebra before the “mafia response” of PP and Vox

“We are going to court, vote here what you really want.” This is how the socialist prosecutor, Ana Sánchez, has announced that the PSOE will denounce the management of the fire operation when the fire in the Sierra de la Culebra in Zamora occurred last June. The announcement has taken place in the debate in the plenary session of the Cortes on an investigation commission on the fire of the Sierra de la Paramera, in Navalacruz last summer and this year in Losacio, and that both Vox and the PP have vetoed with their votes against.

Sánchez has criticized “the mafia response” and the “omertá of the corrupt” and has affirmed that “after all political avenues have been exhausted” the Socialist Group will go to court “as the UGT, CC.OO, Greenpeace, CSIF, the union platform of firefighters or the Ombudsman”. The socialist has accused the regional government, made up of PP and Vox, of “covering up all kinds of corruption by denying explanations to those who trample on and humiliate, those who left their lives in the front line of fire.” “We are going to dignify this Parliament, we are the voice of those who have no voice, they do not have to give explanations to the socialists, who also, but are denying explanations to those who have left their lives in the front line of fire, to those who packed the streets like never before on June 21 and 28. You trample and humiliate firefighters, environmental agents, farmers and ranchers, and the volunteers who were in the shelters caring for the elderly. You, denying explanations and insulting, humiliate the women and men of my land”, she said while the PP attorney, Raúl de la Hoz, rebuked her from his seat.

Awards to “friends”

“Truth and justice”, Sánchez has requested. “The only explanation is to call us miserable, to say that we dabbled in the tragedy, with three deceased, do you call us miserable? What value and what rennet ”, he lamented. “You made a deal with the pandemic, and you have also done it with the fire: you award the communication of the fire operation to the little friends,” he criticized in reference to the exclusive published by this newspaper about the contract of more than 100,000 euros to the partner of a position of trust in the Ministry of the Environment. “What is it that they don’t want us to investigate? Aren’t you ashamed that in the Zamora fire there were more media from Castilla-La Mancha than from Castilla y León? ”, He has questioned.

The person in charge of defending the position of the Government has been David Beltrán, who in addition to being a prosecutor is mayor of Hoyo de Pinares, a town in Ávila where the fire destroyed more than 4,000 hectares, and who has referred to the hard “personal” experience, but defending that there has been a wave of fires throughout the country and that it is “a drama that knows no borders.” He has also come to affirm that the situation of virulent fires is a consequence of climate change, two words that both his party and Vox refuse to pronounce, since they maintain that everything has been due to “extreme circumstances” or “exceptional”. ”.

On the contrary, the socialist has demanded courage and has said that Castilla y León “is the farmhouse of the gentleman of Vox”. “Shall we do fire tourism in Zamora so that they can see how it has turned out?”, She has ironized her. “If being mayor he can return to his devastated town and look his neighbors in the eye…”, she has said.

Vox has justified its vote against because it “always” opposes investigating “prosecuted facts.” Thus, the attorney Carlos Menéndez has recalled that the Sierra de la Panamera fire was filed by the court that opened proceedings while the Sierra de la Culebra fire is under investigation after the CCOO complaint. He has also added that the investigation commissions “only serve to collect allowances” and has given the “welcome to the common sense of the PSOE if it finally decides to denounce”.

“What do they fear, what do they have to hide?” Asked the attorney for United We Can, Pablo Fernández. Former Vice President Francisco Igea has criticized that the PP does not want the fires in Castilla y León to be investigated but those in the Valencian Community, since the PP in Castellón has requested an investigation commission for the Bejís fire. Igea has criticized the regional government for activating the fire communication 15 days before the operation itself – awarded for more than 100,000 euros. “The fire that worried them was the one in the media,” he concluded.

Pedro Pascual, from Por Ávila and has reminded Vox and PP that “summer after summer Castilla y León burns” and that “it is clear that something is not working”. In addition, he has announced to Vox that he is willing to give up his diets. Lastly, the attorney for Soria Ya, Toño Palomar, expressed his surprise at the regional government’s opposition to the commission. “If everything is fine and you don’t want to investigate, maybe there is something to hide,” he deduced.

Vox, the only party that has voted against a law for a dignified death

On the other hand, Vox has been the only party that has voted against the proposed law on rights and guarantees at the end of life, presented by Ciudadanos, with which the debate on the dignity of patients is opened to a life and dignified death and the reinforcement of palliative care. “I don’t want this Law to belong to a political party; I want it to be for everyone.” In this way, the Citizens Attorney wanted to remember that the text that he has defended “is the fruit of the work of many people in autonomous communities, of the consensus in the Congress of Deputies.” “This project has more to do with my profession as a doctor than my political profession. It affects us all because we are all going to go through that path.”

In this regard, he recalled that, in the community and in Spain, “they continue to die badly. He continues to die without information, without knowing what is happening to one; without controlling the symptoms, because people think that the symptoms are just the pain.” “People must say until the end”, he has defended. “Withdrawing life support is still a problem among doctors and people, who do not understand that it is a right. That is why this normative text is important”.

“We have to guarantee that citizens will be citizens until the last of their days; They will have full rights. For what it has claimed “to establish guarantee measures and coercive power to comply with this right, with its obligations, both from the institution and professionals.”

Finally, the Citizens Attorney has claimed “the opportunity to do something useful. Sometimes it is difficult to believe in politics, that our work is useful. Let us give citizens the opportunity to believe in us”.



www.eldiario.es