Friday, March 29

The rare sentence of a youtuber after a false lawsuit against his father-in-law | Digital Trends Spanish

I’m sorry Lenay (Germán’s girlfriend) you shouldn’t be involved in this, but there’s no other choice

Dalas Review is a Spanish youtuber who has over 10 million subscribers on his main channel. He is dedicated to criticizing and commenting on internet personalities and trending topics. He is also a writer of two novels of Science fiction and creator of a video game that was highly criticized.

This man has also been accused of child sexual abuse and cyberbullying by a child under the age of 13, but he has defended himself by saying that he is innocent.

However, the last thing that has splashed him does not benefit him either, since uA judge declared that Dalas Review is guilty of defaming his ex-girlfriend’s father and issued an unprecedented punishment until now, ordering the influencer to read his sentence weekly on his channel for a month. Dalas Review will also have to pay the father of her ex-partner nearly $13,000 in damages.

The peculiar sentence is the latest development in the public feud between Dalas Review, legal name Daniel Santomé, and his ex-girlfriend, the streamer[[” embedded=”” url=”” link=”” data-uri=”03e222343410493739ba5f380b703eb6″>Miare’s Project, nombre legal María Rubio. Según el medio español elDiario, que informó por primera vez sobre la sentencia, Santomé había apuntado al padre de Rubio en la disputa de la pareja, llamando al hombre un «abusador», «un agresor lleno de mierda» y un «cobarde enfermo que está metido en la cabeza» en su canal de YouTube. En un momento dado, Santomé declaró que al padre de Rubio «le gusta golpear a mujeres indefensas en la calle».

La prominencia de Santomé en el mundo del streaming jugó un papel en la decisión del juez, informó elDiario. El juez afirmó que, debido a que Santomé tenía «relevancia social» y era seguido por «miles de adolescentes», sus insultos adquieren un grado de importancia. El juez tampoco estuvo de acuerdo en que los comentarios del YouTuber estuvieran protegidos por la libertad de expresión.

«[Es] hard to believe that someone with an average level of intelligence could think that using freedom of expression as an excuse could say all these insults, which are recognized as insults by the RAE [Real Academia Española, el órgano rector de la lengua], freely on social networks and believe that the target will not feel attacked and that the system will not respond. «,[[” embedded=”” url=”” link=”” data-uri=”596e2c440631df9e80d57821475606b6″>escribió el juez.

Dalas Review en todo caso, no estuvo muy de acuerdo con la sentencia:

«Imagina que golpean a tu novia frente a ti, que te roban a tu perro, que te acosan durante años, y cuando usas con MALAS PALABRAS en tu respuesta a este tipo, te sentencian a pagar $ ‘porque eres una figura pública’», tuiteó el YouTuber en español. «Esta es la injusticia que tengo que soportar hoy».

Recomendaciones del editor










es.digitaltrends.com