Sunday, July 3

US Supreme Court rules Southwest Airlines cannot force wage suit into arbitration

Article content

Southwest Airlines Co cannot force a baggage handler’s class action lawsuit over overtime pay into private arbitration, the US Supreme Court ruled on Monday in a decision with costly potential implications for companies including Inc and Uber Technologies Inc that employ many transportation workers.

The justices ruled 8-0 in a decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas that baggage handlers are engaged in interstate commerce because they routinely load cargo onto planes that cross state lines, exempting them from a federal law that requires the enforcement of agreements to bring legal claims in arbitration rather than court.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Latrice Saxon, a Chicago-based employee who worked as a “ramp supervisor,” accused Southwest in a 2019 lawsuit in Illinois of failing to pay workers overtime. Ramp supervisors train and supervise baggage handlers and sometimes load cargo onto planes.

A Chicago-based federal judge sent the case to arbitration, saying workers are not engaged in interstate commerce merely because they handle cargo. The Chicago-based 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that ruling, prompting Southwest to appeal to the Supreme Court.

In a statement, Southwest said Monday’s ruling would have a minimal impact on the airline because most of its employees who handle baggage are unionized and subject to a separate process for bringing wage claims.

Advertisement 3

Article content

More than half of private-sector US employees have signed arbitration agreements, which typically require them to bring wage disputes individually rather than on behalf of large classes of workers. Business groups have said arbitration is a quicker, more efficient alternative to suing in court.

Other kinds of transportation workers who typically do not cross state lines may use Monday’s decision to argue that they also are exempt from arbitrating wage lawsuits. That means companies such as Amazon and Uber would have to face more class actions rather than claims brought by individual workers in arbitration.

Transportation workers, such as Uber drivers and Amazon “last mile” delivery drivers, have increasingly argued that they are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act because they are engaged in interstate commerce.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Amazon, Uber, Lyft Inc and major trade groups had filed briefs urging the Supreme Court to side with Southwest. They said the Federal Arbitration Act exemption applies narrowly to groups of workers, such as railroad employees and seamen, who actually move goods between states.

The Supreme Court decided that Southwest baggage handlers play a direct and crucial role in moving cargo across borders, even if they do not leave the airports where they work. The court, however, said the Federal Arbitration Act exemption does not necessarily apply to all airline employees.

Saxon’s lawyer, Jennifer Bennett, said the court’s reasoning would likely apply to various groups of workers including last mile delivery drivers.

“The decision establishes the approach courts should be taking in these cases,” Bennett said. (Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)



Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.