Saturday, October 16

Why Nord Stream 2 May Not Be Ready in Time for Europe’s Winter


Article content

(Bloomberg) — The controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline has the potential to ease Europe’s gas crisis, and Russia says the project is on track. But obstacles remain — and some of them could take months to clear.

The 750-mile link under the Baltic Sea to Germany has been completed and has begun to receive gas for testing. Exporter Gazprom PJSC this week got Danish approval for one of the lines to start, but it needs a crucial nod from Germany before fuel can flow to western Europe. Here’s a look at what lies ahead.

Advertisement

Article content

German Approval

Germany’s regulator, the Bundesnetzagentur, needs to be satisfied that operator Nord Stream 2 AG meets European Union regulations requiring the separation of gas transport from production and sales, known as unbundling.

The country has until early January to make a draft decision on certification, which it must send to the European Commission for review. The EU then has two months to act, a timeframe that can be extended by another two months, potentially taking the process as far as May.

Political Pushback

Europe’s gas crunch has brought the region’s reliance on Russia, its biggest supplier, sharply into focus. Gazprom has capped flows to the continent as it replenishes its own stockpiles for winter, sparking criticism that it’s withholding supplies to force faster approval of Nord Stream 2. The company says it’s meeting all contractual obligations.

Advertisement

Article content

With certification potentially months away, and Europe facing winter with the lowest gas-storage levels in more than a decade, there’s concern in the European Parliament that Nord Stream 2 may decide to start flows without the necessary approvals. Senior lawmakers on Tuesday called on the European Commission to exercise all its powers to ensure compliance with EU law.

The project does not yet meet unbundling criteria, they said, urging a “clear and robust Commission opinion in the certification procedure.”

The EU General Court on Wednesday will issue an opinion on an appeal lodged by Nord Stream 2 over gas-market legislation requiring unbundling. The court last year rejected a lawsuit from the company to annul the law. Court opinions are usually a good indication of what the final decision might be.

Advertisement

Article content

Politicians have also had to weigh up the EU’s need for energy security versus its accelerating shift away from fossil fuels. And with Germany’s Green Party expected to play a key role in coalition talks following the country’s recent election, further political setbacks to the project can’ t be ruled out.

Legal Risk

In their letter to EU Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson, the lawmakers said the EU’s executive arm should be prepared to use “interim measures” if Nord Stream 2 starts shipping gas to Germany before getting necessary approvals.

After the pipe’s operator said it had started filling one of the lines with gas, Germany’s regulator also sought assurance that it won’t start flows before getting the required consents.

Advertisement

Article content

“According to the information available to the Bundesnetzagentur it cannot be ruled out that Nord Stream 2 AG will put the interconnector into operation in the near future,” it said Oct. 4, requesting “evidence that all regulatory requirements” are met for third- party access.

Any early flows on the pipeline would likely be detected swiftly, with all parties involved liable for penalties. Whether the operator would be willing to risk a fine, citing Europe’s desperate need for fuel, is unclear. Nord Stream 2 has said several times it will follow all necessary procedures before starting the line.

2021 Still In Play

Some industry watchers, from Bank of America Corp. to ICIS, still see potential for Nord Stream 2 to start this year, especially if Europe’s energy crisis speeds up regulatory approvals.

Advertisement

Article content

“It is still plausible Nord Stream 2 could run in some capacity during 2021,” said Tom Marzec-Manser, an analyst at ICIS. “Just because a regulator has a maximum of four months to approve an application, does not necessarily mean it will take four months.”

But many others see start-up pushed to next year. Energy Aspects has estimated February for flows to begin, saying the risks are “biased to it being later than that rather than earlier.” VTB Capital sees operations beginning “from mid-2022. “

Even if the pipe does start soon, it’s unclear whether Russia would have enough spare output capacity to increase exports to Europe fast, especially given surging demand at home. Opponents of Nord Stream 2 insist Gazprom already has sufficient delivery routes through other countries, and analysts have noted that the lack of supply is more an issue of production capability.

As such, it’s likely that Nord Stream 2 would only help to alleviate, not eliminate, the region’s severe gas deficit. The impact on near-term prices would therefore be limited, with Europe dependent on a number of supply and demand factors to ease the crisis.

©2021 Bloomberg LP

Bloomberg.com

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.



financialpost.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *